iGaming Network
← CQ9
Zeus M

CQ9

Zeus M

Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96

Current source RTP

Average72.42%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Mid band — expect some bumps

You’re at 72.42% — middle of the pack. Fine for a night out if you keep it light. Not a sign something big is “owed.”

Quick tip: Mid-range nights go better when they’re short.

  1. Be honest: are you playing for fun, or trying to get even? Stop if it’s the second.
  2. Autoplay makes it easy to ignore the clock — turn it off if that happens to you.
  3. Cap how many times you’ll change stake tonight. Two is plenty.
  4. Use a tighter loss stop than you would on Good titles.
  5. Mid-band isn’t a mystery to crack. It’s just another random game.

Skip this

  • Don’t stack hope on bigger and bigger stakes.
  • Don’t read every quiet stretch as a pattern forming.

Swings happen here. Chasing them is optional — and costly.

In plain words

72.42% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

71.39%

Average

72.56%

Highest

73.60%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 72.97%2026-10-27 05:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 71.55%2026-10-26 23:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 71.74%2026-10-26 17:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.60%2026-10-26 11:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 71.61%2026-10-26 05:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.55%2026-10-25 23:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.90%2026-10-25 17:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 71.39%2026-10-25 11:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.18%2026-10-25 05:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.92%2026-10-24 23:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.76%2026-10-24 17:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.60%2026-10-24 11:12 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ez96ld.com/