CQ9
Fa Cai Shen M
Display brand: JOM99 · Data source: JOM99
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · CQ9
How we’d play this
If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)
96.06% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
- If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
- Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
- Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
Skip this
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
- Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
96.06% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
94.98%
Average
95.91%
Highest
97.00%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 96.47%2026-10-27 04:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.89%2026-10-26 22:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.07%2026-10-26 16:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.56%2026-10-26 10:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.98%2026-10-26 04:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.30%2026-10-25 22:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.49%2026-10-25 16:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.28%2026-10-25 10:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.49%2026-10-25 04:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.52%2026-10-24 22:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.90%2026-10-24 16:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 97.00%2026-10-24 10:41 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://jom99ld.com/