
CQ9
DiscoNight M
Display brand: RUSH33 · Data source: RUSH33
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · CQ9
How we’d play this
Before you mash spin on a Good title
92.67% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.
- Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
- Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
- If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
Skip this
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
92.67% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
91.56%
Average
92.17%
Highest
93.44%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 91.91%2026-10-27 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.66%2026-10-26 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.99%2026-10-26 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.27%2026-10-26 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.69%2026-10-26 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.82%2026-10-25 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.56%2026-10-25 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.35%2026-10-25 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.09%2026-10-25 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.45%2026-10-24 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.82%2026-10-24 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.44%2026-10-24 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://rush33ld.com/
