iGaming Network
← CQ9
Fa Cai Fu Wa

CQ9

Fa Cai Fu Wa

Display brand: JUS22 · Data source: JUS22

Current source RTP

Average73.26%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Mid band — expect some bumps

You’re at 73.26% — middle of the pack. Fine for a night out if you keep it light. Not a sign something big is “owed.”

Quick tip: Mid-range nights go better when they’re short.

  1. Use a tighter loss stop than you would on Good titles.
  2. If stretching the money matters, peek at Good filter titles instead.
  3. End on the timer even if you’re “almost” at a win target.
  4. When it gets choppy, shrink the bet — don’t lengthen the night.
  5. Only bump the stake one step after a win — never after a loss.

Skip this

  • Don’t double after every loss. That spiral ends badly.
  • Don’t read every quiet stretch as a pattern forming.

Swings happen here. Chasing them is optional — and costly.

In plain words

73.26% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

72.27%

Average

73.48%

Highest

74.37%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 72.86%2026-10-27 04:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.91%2026-10-26 22:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 74.37%2026-10-26 16:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.51%2026-10-26 10:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.61%2026-10-26 04:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.51%2026-10-25 22:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.67%2026-10-25 16:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.58%2026-10-25 10:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 74.37%2026-10-25 04:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.27%2026-10-24 22:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.86%2026-10-24 16:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 73.28%2026-10-24 10:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://jus22ld.com/