CQ9
Fa Cai Fu Wa
Display brand: SA969 · Data source: SA969
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · CQ9
How we’d play this
Average RTP without the drama
You’re at 74.37% — middle of the pack. Fine for a night out if you keep it light. Not a sign something big is “owed.”
Quick tip: Survive the swings — don’t argue with them.
- Only bump the stake one step after a win — never after a loss.
- End on the timer even if you’re “almost” at a win target.
- When it gets choppy, shrink the bet — don’t lengthen the night.
- If stretching the money matters, peek at Good filter titles instead.
- Cap how many times you’ll change stake tonight. Two is plenty.
Skip this
- Don’t skip the stop-loss “just this once.”
- Don’t read every quiet stretch as a pattern forming.
Swings happen here. Chasing them is optional — and costly.
In plain words
74.37% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
73.23%
Average
73.99%
Highest
75.17%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 73.23%2026-10-27 07:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 74.18%2026-10-27 01:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 74.60%2026-10-26 19:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 73.32%2026-10-26 13:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 73.32%2026-10-26 07:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 75.17%2026-10-26 01:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 74.30%2026-10-25 19:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 74.33%2026-10-25 13:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 73.59%2026-10-25 07:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 73.87%2026-10-25 01:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 74.29%2026-10-24 19:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 73.69%2026-10-24 13:08 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://sa969ld.com/