iGaming Network
← CQ9
Double Fly

CQ9

Double Fly

Display brand: PP96 · Data source: PP96

Current source RTP

Good95.60%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)

95.60% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.

  1. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  2. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  3. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
  4. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  5. Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.

Skip this

  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
  • Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

95.60% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

94.47%

Average

95.95%

Highest

96.61%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 96.13%2026-10-27 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.47%2026-10-26 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.86%2026-10-26 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.46%2026-10-26 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.20%2026-10-26 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.61%2026-10-25 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.17%2026-10-25 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.39%2026-10-25 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.34%2026-10-25 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.64%2026-10-24 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.16%2026-10-24 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.98%2026-10-24 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://pp96ld.com/