iGaming Network
← CQ9
Double Fly

CQ9

Double Fly

Display brand: SA969 · Data source: SA969

Current source RTP

Average81.04%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Mid band — expect some bumps

81.04% mid-band. Fun is okay. Chasing is expensive.

Quick tip: Mid-range nights go better when they’re short.

  1. If stretching the money matters, peek at Good filter titles instead.
  2. Use a tighter loss stop than you would on Good titles.
  3. Break your session money into lots of tiny bets so a cold stretch doesn’t wipe you.
  4. Fifteen–twenty minutes of nothing but red? Switch game or take a break.
  5. Three bad decisions in a row? Phone down, five-minute walk.

Skip this

  • Don’t trust chat that says “about to break.”
  • Don’t double after every loss. That spiral ends badly.

Average still means random. There’s no mid-band trick that unlocks the next spin.

In plain words

81.04% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

If someone sells a guaranteed sequence, they’re selling fiction. Your stop-loss is real.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

79.95%

Average

81.13%

Highest

82.22%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 81.73%2026-10-27 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 81.90%2026-10-26 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 82.22%2026-10-26 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 80.91%2026-10-26 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 81.74%2026-10-26 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 80.52%2026-10-25 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 79.95%2026-10-25 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 80.31%2026-10-25 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 80.43%2026-10-25 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 79.98%2026-10-24 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 82.18%2026-10-24 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 81.69%2026-10-24 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://sa969ld.com/