iGaming Network
← CQ9
Black Wukong

CQ9

Black Wukong

Display brand: ACE33 · Data source: ACE33

Current source RTP

Good95.70%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

95.70% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
  2. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  3. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  4. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  5. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.

Skip this

  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

95.70% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

94.53%

Average

95.51%

Highest

96.79%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 95.56%2026-10-27 08:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.72%2026-10-27 02:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.01%2026-10-26 20:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.96%2026-10-26 14:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.80%2026-10-26 08:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.64%2026-10-26 02:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.95%2026-10-25 20:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.54%2026-10-25 14:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.08%2026-10-25 08:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.53%2026-10-25 02:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.53%2026-10-24 20:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.79%2026-10-24 14:10 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ace33ld.com/