iGaming Network
← CQ9
Aladdin's lamp

CQ9

Aladdin's lamp

Display brand: MAX39 · Data source: MAX39

Current source RTP

Good89.86%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)

89.86% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.

  1. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
  2. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  3. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  4. Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
  5. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.

Skip this

  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

89.86% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

88.68%

Average

89.40%

Highest

89.96%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 89.58%2026-10-27 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.11%2026-10-26 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.82%2026-10-26 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.76%2026-10-26 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.50%2026-10-26 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.75%2026-10-25 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.95%2026-10-25 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.99%2026-10-25 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.96%2026-10-25 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.33%2026-10-24 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.34%2026-10-24 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.68%2026-10-24 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://max39ld.com/