
CQ9
Thor 2
Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · CQ9
How we’d play this
What we’d actually do here
91.25% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Short blocks beat endless grinding.
- Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
- If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
- Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
- When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
Skip this
- Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
91.25% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
90.29%
Average
91.28%
Highest
92.00%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 92.00%2026-10-27 05:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.89%2026-10-26 23:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.98%2026-10-26 17:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.93%2026-10-26 11:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.83%2026-10-26 05:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.29%2026-10-25 23:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.16%2026-10-25 17:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.55%2026-10-25 11:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.37%2026-10-25 05:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.83%2026-10-24 23:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.93%2026-10-24 17:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.64%2026-10-24 11:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://ez96ld.com/
