iGaming Network
← CQ9
Dragon Ball

CQ9

Dragon Ball

Display brand: MY36 · Data source: MY36

Current source RTP

Good87.96%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)

87.96% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.

  1. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  2. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
  3. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  4. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  5. Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.

Skip this

  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.
  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

87.96% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.

Lowest

86.93%

Average

88.07%

Highest

89.16%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 88.86%2026-10-27 05:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.13%2026-10-26 23:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.73%2026-10-26 17:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.40%2026-10-26 11:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.20%2026-10-26 05:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.30%2026-10-25 23:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.16%2026-10-25 17:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.43%2026-10-25 11:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.56%2026-10-25 05:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.93%2026-10-24 23:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.09%2026-10-24 17:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.02%2026-10-24 11:56 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://my36ld.com/