iGaming Network
← CQ9
Dragon Ball

CQ9

Dragon Ball

Display brand: YES82 · Data source: YES82

Current source RTP

Low60.46%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Low RTP — keep this tiny

At 60.46% you’re in the thinner band. If you play, keep stakes small and leave early.

Quick tip: Want efficiency? Change the filter, not the stake.

  1. Smallest comfortable stake. Ten to twenty minutes, max.
  2. One deposit for the session. No angry top-ups.
  3. Never raise the stake to “make Low pay you back.”
  4. Walking away early beats another “one more try.”
  5. Rare big hit? Cash the vibe and leave. Don’t farm it.

Skip this

  • Don’t turn a ten-minute plan into an hour.
  • Don’t assume Low “must pay big soon.”

Anyone selling “Low pasti cair” is inventing certainty.

In plain words

60.46% — Low (under 70%). Tougher band. Keep expectations small.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

59.41%

Average

60.58%

Highest

61.65%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 60.89%2026-10-27 04:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 59.73%2026-10-26 22:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 59.41%2026-10-26 16:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 60.06%2026-10-26 10:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 59.61%2026-10-26 04:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.09%2026-10-25 22:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.65%2026-10-25 16:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.63%2026-10-25 10:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 60.09%2026-10-25 04:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.38%2026-10-24 22:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 60.15%2026-10-24 16:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.31%2026-10-24 10:41 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://yes82ld.com/