iGaming Network
← CQ9
DiscoNight

CQ9

DiscoNight

Display brand: RUSH33 · Data source: RUSH33

Current source RTP

Good86.89%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

86.89% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  2. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  3. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  4. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  5. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.

Skip this

  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

86.89% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

85.82%

Average

87.01%

Highest

87.87%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 87.23%2026-10-27 04:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.55%2026-10-26 22:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.67%2026-10-26 16:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.89%2026-10-26 10:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.47%2026-10-26 04:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.80%2026-10-25 22:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.35%2026-10-25 16:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.36%2026-10-25 10:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.73%2026-10-25 04:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.37%2026-10-24 22:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.82%2026-10-24 16:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.87%2026-10-24 10:42 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://rush33ld.com/