iGaming Network
← CQ9
DiscoNight

CQ9

DiscoNight

Display brand: SA969 · Data source: SA969

Current source RTP

Good92.41%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

92.41% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  2. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  3. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
  4. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
  5. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
  • Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

92.41% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.

Lowest

91.22%

Average

92.48%

Highest

93.58%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 93.09%2026-10-27 04:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.68%2026-10-26 22:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.65%2026-10-26 16:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.22%2026-10-26 10:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.00%2026-10-26 04:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.63%2026-10-25 22:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.80%2026-10-25 16:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.39%2026-10-25 10:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.83%2026-10-25 04:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.30%2026-10-24 22:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.62%2026-10-24 16:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.58%2026-10-24 10:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://sa969ld.com/