iGaming Network
← CQ9
DiscoNight

CQ9

DiscoNight

Display brand: VS96 · Data source: VS96

Current source RTP

Good89.85%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

A calmer way to sit with Good RTP

89.85% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: If you’re tilting, you’re done for now.

  1. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  2. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  3. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
  4. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  5. Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.

Skip this

  • Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

89.85% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

88.67%

Average

89.68%

Highest

91.00%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 89.16%2026-10-27 04:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.00%2026-10-26 22:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.60%2026-10-26 16:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.01%2026-10-26 10:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.90%2026-10-26 04:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.44%2026-10-25 22:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.38%2026-10-25 16:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.20%2026-10-25 10:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.70%2026-10-25 04:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.67%2026-10-24 22:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.17%2026-10-24 16:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.96%2026-10-24 10:43 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://vs96ld.com/