
CQ9
Baseball Fever
Display brand: MAX39 · Data source: MAX39
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · CQ9
How we’d play this
Good band — keep it simple
92.79% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
- Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
- Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
- Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
Skip this
- Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
92.79% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
91.74%
Average
92.92%
Highest
93.94%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 92.01%2026-10-27 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.04%2026-10-26 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.24%2026-10-26 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.94%2026-10-26 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.55%2026-10-26 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.87%2026-10-25 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.08%2026-10-25 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.76%2026-10-25 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.07%2026-10-25 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.66%2026-10-24 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.74%2026-10-24 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.13%2026-10-24 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://max39ld.com/
