iGaming Network
← CQ9
Da Fa Cai

CQ9

Da Fa Cai

Display brand: ZAS36 · Data source: ZAS36

Current source RTP

Good91.81%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)

91.81% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.

  1. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  2. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  3. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  4. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  5. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

91.81% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

90.67%

Average

91.42%

Highest

92.84%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 92.84%2026-10-27 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.79%2026-10-26 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.99%2026-10-26 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.03%2026-10-26 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.27%2026-10-26 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.67%2026-10-25 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.13%2026-10-25 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.24%2026-10-25 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.89%2026-10-25 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.66%2026-10-24 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 91.91%2026-10-24 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.67%2026-10-24 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://zas36ld.com/