iGaming Network
← CQ9
Blast Away

CQ9

Blast Away

Display brand: JUS22 · Data source: JUS22

Current source RTP

Average82.64%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Average RTP without the drama

You’re at 82.64% — middle of the pack. Fine for a night out if you keep it light. Not a sign something big is “owed.”

Quick tip: Survive the swings — don’t argue with them.

  1. Be honest: are you playing for fun, or trying to get even? Stop if it’s the second.
  2. Fifteen–twenty minutes of nothing but red? Switch game or take a break.
  3. Only bump the stake one step after a win — never after a loss.
  4. Use a tighter loss stop than you would on Good titles.
  5. Three bad decisions in a row? Phone down, five-minute walk.

Skip this

  • Don’t trust chat that says “about to break.”
  • Don’t skip the stop-loss “just this once.”

Swings happen here. Chasing them is optional — and costly.

In plain words

82.64% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

81.46%

Average

82.80%

Highest

83.76%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 82.70%2026-10-27 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.65%2026-10-26 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 81.46%2026-10-26 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.49%2026-10-26 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 81.66%2026-10-26 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 82.73%2026-10-25 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.30%2026-10-25 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.39%2026-10-25 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.76%2026-10-25 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 82.67%2026-10-24 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 81.63%2026-10-24 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 83.19%2026-10-24 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://jus22ld.com/