iGaming Network
← CQ9
Blast Away

CQ9

Blast Away

Display brand: PP96 · Data source: PP96

Current source RTP

Good93.81%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

93.81% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  2. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  3. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  4. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  5. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.

Skip this

  • Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

93.81% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.

Lowest

93.02%

Average

93.98%

Highest

94.86%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 94.50%2026-10-27 04:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.52%2026-10-26 22:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.86%2026-10-26 16:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.31%2026-10-26 10:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.49%2026-10-26 04:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.66%2026-10-25 22:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.38%2026-10-25 16:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.38%2026-10-25 10:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.02%2026-10-25 04:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.51%2026-10-24 22:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.98%2026-10-24 16:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.18%2026-10-24 10:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://pp96ld.com/