
CQ9
Fire Queen
Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · CQ9
How we’d play this
Before you mash spin on a Good title
97.00% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.
- When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
- Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
- Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
- Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
Skip this
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
97.00% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
95.94%
Average
96.77%
Highest
97.00%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 97.00%2026-10-27 05:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 97.00%2026-10-26 23:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 97.00%2026-10-26 17:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 97.00%2026-10-26 11:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.39%2026-10-26 05:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 97.00%2026-10-25 23:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 97.00%2026-10-25 17:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 97.00%2026-10-25 11:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.94%2026-10-25 05:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.95%2026-10-24 23:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.24%2026-10-24 17:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.69%2026-10-24 11:12 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://ez96ld.com/
