iGaming Network
← CQ9
All Star Team

CQ9

All Star Team

Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96

Current source RTP

Good93.86%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

93.86% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  2. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
  3. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  4. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  5. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.

Skip this

  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

93.86% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

93.11%

Average

94.06%

Highest

94.97%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 94.25%2026-10-27 03:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.62%2026-10-26 21:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.10%2026-10-26 15:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.59%2026-10-26 09:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.62%2026-10-26 03:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.11%2026-10-25 21:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.66%2026-10-25 15:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.97%2026-10-25 09:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.28%2026-10-25 03:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.29%2026-10-24 21:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.43%2026-10-24 15:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.74%2026-10-24 09:24 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ez96ld.com/