
CQ9
Boots of Luck
Display brand: FUN36 · Data source: FUN36
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · CQ9
How we’d play this
What we’d actually do here
95.91% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Short blocks beat endless grinding.
- Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
- Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
- Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
- Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
Skip this
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
- Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
95.91% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.
Lowest
94.76%
Average
95.74%
Highest
96.97%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 95.75%2026-10-27 07:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.77%2026-10-27 01:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.24%2026-10-26 19:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.83%2026-10-26 13:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.82%2026-10-26 07:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.69%2026-10-26 01:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.43%2026-10-25 19:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.64%2026-10-25 13:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 95.43%2026-10-25 07:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.97%2026-10-25 01:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.76%2026-10-24 19:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 96.59%2026-10-24 13:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://fun36ld.com/
