iGaming Network
← CQ9
Cirque de fous

CQ9

Cirque de fous

Display brand: BIG321 · Data source: BIG321

Current source RTP

Average71.90%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

Mid band — expect some bumps

You’re at 71.90% — middle of the pack. Fine for a night out if you keep it light. Not a sign something big is “owed.”

Quick tip: Mid-range nights go better when they’re short.

  1. Autoplay makes it easy to ignore the clock — turn it off if that happens to you.
  2. Mid-band isn’t a mystery to crack. It’s just another random game.
  3. Cap how many times you’ll change stake tonight. Two is plenty.
  4. Fifteen–twenty minutes of nothing but red? Switch game or take a break.
  5. Only bump the stake one step after a win — never after a loss.

Skip this

  • Don’t stay longer just because you’re down.
  • Don’t skip the stop-loss “just this once.”

Swings happen here. Chasing them is optional — and costly.

In plain words

71.90% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

70.71%

Average

72.07%

Highest

73.00%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 73.00%2026-10-27 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.77%2026-10-26 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.76%2026-10-26 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.80%2026-10-26 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 71.57%2026-10-26 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 71.32%2026-10-25 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.51%2026-10-25 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 71.77%2026-10-25 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 70.71%2026-10-25 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.24%2026-10-24 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 71.13%2026-10-24 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 72.29%2026-10-24 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://big321ld.com/