iGaming Network
← CQ9
Dragon Hunters

CQ9

Dragon Hunters

Display brand: ONG66 · Data source: ONG66

Current source RTP

Good87.06%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)

87.06% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.

  1. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  2. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  3. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  4. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  5. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
  • Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

87.06% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.

Lowest

85.86%

Average

86.99%

Highest

87.98%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 86.10%2026-10-27 05:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.24%2026-10-26 23:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.87%2026-10-26 17:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.86%2026-10-26 11:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.11%2026-10-26 05:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.83%2026-10-25 23:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.99%2026-10-25 17:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.98%2026-10-25 11:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.68%2026-10-25 05:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.98%2026-10-24 23:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.85%2026-10-24 17:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.34%2026-10-24 11:55 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ong66ld.com/