iGaming Network
← CQ9
Dragon Hunters

CQ9

Dragon Hunters

Display brand: RUSH33 · Data source: RUSH33

Current source RTP

Good86.83%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · CQ9

How we’d play this

What we’d actually do here

86.83% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Short blocks beat endless grinding.

  1. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
  2. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  3. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  4. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
  5. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

86.83% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

85.71%

Average

86.78%

Highest

87.94%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 85.71%2026-10-27 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.34%2026-10-26 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.39%2026-10-26 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.94%2026-10-26 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.97%2026-10-26 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.08%2026-10-25 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.48%2026-10-25 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.51%2026-10-25 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.35%2026-10-25 04:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.54%2026-10-24 22:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.44%2026-10-24 16:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.61%2026-10-24 10:39 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://rush33ld.com/