iGaming Network
← Fa Chai
KONG ISLAND

Fa Chai

KONG ISLAND

Display brand: SPIN321 · Data source: SPIN321

Current source RTP

Good87.17%

Last observed 2026-10-27 05:54 UTC

Share this RTP page · Fa Chai

How we’d play this

If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)

87.17% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.

  1. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
  2. Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
  3. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
  4. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  5. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

87.17% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

86.32%

Average

87.20%

Highest

88.32%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 87.42%2026-10-27 05:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.78%2026-10-26 23:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.85%2026-10-26 17:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.10%2026-10-26 11:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.32%2026-10-26 05:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.28%2026-10-25 23:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.29%2026-10-25 17:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.16%2026-10-25 11:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.29%2026-10-25 05:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.61%2026-10-24 23:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.01%2026-10-24 17:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.32%2026-10-24 11:54 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://spin321ld.com/