iGaming Network
← FastSpin
Fortune Jewels II

FastSpin

Fortune Jewels II

Display brand: JUS22 · Data source: JUS22

Current source RTP

Good88.68%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · FastSpin

How we’d play this

Before you mash spin on a Good title

88.68% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.

  1. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  2. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  3. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  4. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  5. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.

Skip this

  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

88.68% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.

Lowest

87.74%

Average

88.94%

Highest

89.83%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 88.12%2026-10-27 08:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.28%2026-10-27 02:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.48%2026-10-26 20:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.81%2026-10-26 14:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.71%2026-10-26 08:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.81%2026-10-26 02:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.83%2026-10-25 20:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.06%2026-10-25 14:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.74%2026-10-25 08:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.79%2026-10-25 02:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.76%2026-10-24 20:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.89%2026-10-24 14:15 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://jus22ld.com/