iGaming Network
← Hacksaw Gaming
Anubis Wrath

Hacksaw Gaming

Anubis Wrath

Display brand: RUSH33 · Data source: RUSH33

Current source RTP

Good89.92%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · Hacksaw Gaming

How we’d play this

Before you mash spin on a Good title

89.92% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.

  1. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  2. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  3. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  4. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  5. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.

Skip this

  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

89.92% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

88.94%

Average

89.77%

Highest

90.77%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 88.94%2026-10-27 04:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.29%2026-10-26 22:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.08%2026-10-26 16:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.44%2026-10-26 10:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.42%2026-10-26 04:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.15%2026-10-25 22:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.22%2026-10-25 16:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.77%2026-10-25 10:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.23%2026-10-25 04:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.73%2026-10-24 22:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.37%2026-10-24 16:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.59%2026-10-24 10:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://rush33ld.com/