
Jili
Charge Buffalo ASCENT
Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-27 06:11 UTC
Share this RTP page · Jili
How we’d play this
Before you mash spin on a Good title
92.34% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.
- Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
- When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
- Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
Skip this
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
92.34% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
91.35%
Average
91.87%
Highest
93.17%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 92.56%2026-10-27 06:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.44%2026-10-27 00:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.56%2026-10-26 18:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.54%2026-10-26 12:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.17%2026-10-26 06:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.62%2026-10-26 00:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.73%2026-10-25 18:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.35%2026-10-25 12:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.65%2026-10-25 06:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.62%2026-10-25 00:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.81%2026-10-24 18:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.38%2026-10-24 12:11 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://ez96ld.com/
