
Jili
100 Blazing Clover
Display brand: PP96 · Data source: PP96
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · Jili
How we’d play this
What we’d actually do here
87.18% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Short blocks beat endless grinding.
- If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
- Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
- Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
Skip this
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
- Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
87.18% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
86.03%
Average
87.46%
Highest
88.33%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 88.11%2026-10-27 07:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.64%2026-10-27 01:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.25%2026-10-26 19:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.01%2026-10-26 13:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.33%2026-10-26 07:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.03%2026-10-26 01:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.74%2026-10-25 19:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.01%2026-10-25 13:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.32%2026-10-25 07:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.94%2026-10-25 01:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.02%2026-10-24 19:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.17%2026-10-24 13:07 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://pp96ld.com/
