iGaming Network
← Jili
100 Blazing Clover

Jili

100 Blazing Clover

Display brand: ZAS36 · Data source: ZAS36

Current source RTP

Good87.23%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · Jili

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

87.23% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  2. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  3. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  4. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
  5. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

87.23% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

86.21%

Average

87.30%

Highest

88.18%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 87.70%2026-10-27 07:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.06%2026-10-27 01:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.21%2026-10-26 19:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.19%2026-10-26 13:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.80%2026-10-26 07:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.18%2026-10-26 01:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.05%2026-10-25 19:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.02%2026-10-25 13:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.24%2026-10-25 07:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.51%2026-10-25 01:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.75%2026-10-24 19:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.83%2026-10-24 13:07 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://zas36ld.com/