iGaming Network
← Legendary
Castle Guardian

Legendary

Castle Guardian

Display brand: RUSH33 · Data source: RUSH33

Current source RTP

Good96.21%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · Legendary

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

96.21% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
  2. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  3. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
  4. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  5. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

96.21% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

95.14%

Average

96.21%

Highest

97.00%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 97.00%2026-10-27 04:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.97%2026-10-26 22:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.02%2026-10-26 16:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.70%2026-10-26 10:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.14%2026-10-26 04:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.60%2026-10-25 22:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.65%2026-10-25 16:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.55%2026-10-25 10:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.25%2026-10-25 04:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.72%2026-10-24 22:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.81%2026-10-24 16:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 96.07%2026-10-24 10:44 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://rush33ld.com/