iGaming Network
← Legendary
Candy House

Legendary

Candy House

Display brand: PP96 · Data source: PP96

Current source RTP

Low62.25%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · Legendary

How we’d play this

Short fun, not a comeback plan

At 62.25% you’re in the thinner band. If you play, keep stakes small and leave early.

Quick tip: Low is entertainment only — never a recovery plan.

  1. Walking away early beats another “one more try.”
  2. If you’re annoyed before you start, don’t start.
  3. One deposit for the session. No angry top-ups.
  4. Write your stop numbers before the first spin.
  5. Set a tight loss stop and actually honor it.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat a dry spell as proof a hit is next.
  • Don’t chase the same loss across three Low games.

Anyone selling “Low pasti cair” is inventing certainty.

In plain words

62.25% — Low (under 70%). Tougher band. Keep expectations small.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

61.37%

Average

62.74%

Highest

63.44%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 62.69%2026-10-27 04:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.36%2026-10-26 22:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.37%2026-10-26 16:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.65%2026-10-26 10:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.44%2026-10-26 04:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.67%2026-10-25 22:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.40%2026-10-25 16:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.27%2026-10-25 10:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.40%2026-10-25 04:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.15%2026-10-24 22:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.07%2026-10-24 16:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.44%2026-10-24 10:40 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://pp96ld.com/