iGaming Network
← NetEnt
Asgardian Stones

NetEnt

Asgardian Stones

Display brand: OMG67 · Data source: OMG67

Current source RTP

Good85.66%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · NetEnt

How we’d play this

A calmer way to sit with Good RTP

85.66% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: If you’re tilting, you’re done for now.

  1. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  2. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  3. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  4. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  5. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.

Skip this

  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

85.66% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.

Lowest

85.00%

Average

85.69%

Highest

86.62%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 85.83%2026-10-27 04:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.17%2026-10-26 22:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.00%2026-10-26 16:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.00%2026-10-26 10:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.29%2026-10-26 04:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.62%2026-10-25 22:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.00%2026-10-25 16:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.00%2026-10-25 10:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.40%2026-10-25 04:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.46%2026-10-24 22:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.00%2026-10-24 16:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.55%2026-10-24 10:50 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://omg67ld.com/