

NetEnt
Blood Suckers II
Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · NetEnt
How we’d play this
Before you mash spin on a Good title
89.79% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.
- Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
- Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
- Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
Skip this
- Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.
- Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
89.79% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
88.67%
Average
89.62%
Highest
90.66%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 89.87%2026-10-27 03:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.67%2026-10-26 21:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.00%2026-10-26 15:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.66%2026-10-26 09:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.52%2026-10-26 03:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.63%2026-10-25 21:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.25%2026-10-25 15:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.04%2026-10-25 09:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.13%2026-10-25 03:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.51%2026-10-24 21:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.43%2026-10-24 15:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.75%2026-10-24 09:27 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://ez96ld.com/
