iGaming Network
← NetEnt
Blood Suckers II

NetEnt

Blood Suckers II

Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96

Current source RTP

Good89.79%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · NetEnt

How we’d play this

Before you mash spin on a Good title

89.79% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.

  1. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
  2. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  3. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  4. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  5. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.

Skip this

  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.
  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

89.79% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

88.67%

Average

89.62%

Highest

90.66%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 89.87%2026-10-27 03:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.67%2026-10-26 21:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.00%2026-10-26 15:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.66%2026-10-26 09:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.52%2026-10-26 03:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.63%2026-10-25 21:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.25%2026-10-25 15:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.04%2026-10-25 09:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.13%2026-10-25 03:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.51%2026-10-24 21:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.43%2026-10-24 15:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.75%2026-10-24 09:27 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ez96ld.com/