

NetEnt
Blood Suckers II
Display brand: ONG66 · Data source: ONG66
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · NetEnt
How we’d play this
Good band — keep it simple
92.65% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.
- Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
- Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
Skip this
- Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
- Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
92.65% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
91.78%
Average
92.99%
Highest
93.77%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 92.28%2026-10-27 04:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.04%2026-10-26 22:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.77%2026-10-26 16:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.58%2026-10-26 10:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.47%2026-10-26 04:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.29%2026-10-25 22:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.36%2026-10-25 16:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.01%2026-10-25 10:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.66%2026-10-25 04:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.39%2026-10-24 22:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.78%2026-10-24 16:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.24%2026-10-24 10:47 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://ong66ld.com/
