iGaming Network
← NetEnt
Blood Suckers II

NetEnt

Blood Suckers II

Display brand: RM68 · Data source: RM68

Current source RTP

Average79.94%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · NetEnt

How we’d play this

Average RTP without the drama

79.94% mid-band. Fun is okay. Chasing is expensive.

Quick tip: Survive the swings — don’t argue with them.

  1. If stretching the money matters, peek at Good filter titles instead.
  2. When it gets choppy, shrink the bet — don’t lengthen the night.
  3. Be honest: are you playing for fun, or trying to get even? Stop if it’s the second.
  4. Fifteen–twenty minutes of nothing but red? Switch game or take a break.
  5. Three bad decisions in a row? Phone down, five-minute walk.

Skip this

  • Don’t double after every loss. That spiral ends badly.
  • Don’t stack hope on bigger and bigger stakes.

Average still means random. There’s no mid-band trick that unlocks the next spin.

In plain words

79.94% — Average (70–85%). Middle ground. Every spin is still a coin flip in practice.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

If someone sells a guaranteed sequence, they’re selling fiction. Your stop-loss is real.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

78.80%

Average

79.79%

Highest

81.01%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 80.41%2026-10-27 07:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 78.87%2026-10-27 01:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 80.13%2026-10-26 19:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 81.01%2026-10-26 13:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 80.61%2026-10-26 07:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 78.88%2026-10-26 01:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 78.80%2026-10-25 19:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 79.91%2026-10-25 13:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 79.71%2026-10-25 07:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 80.61%2026-10-25 01:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 78.88%2026-10-24 19:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 79.63%2026-10-24 13:11 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://rm68ld.com/