

NetEnt
Blood Suckers II
Display brand: RUSH33 · Data source: RUSH33
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · NetEnt
How we’d play this
Before you mash spin on a Good title
93.66% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.
- Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
- If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
- Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
- Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
Skip this
- Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
93.66% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
92.48%
Average
93.57%
Highest
94.69%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 93.57%2026-10-27 05:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.52%2026-10-26 23:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.11%2026-10-26 17:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.06%2026-10-26 11:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.41%2026-10-26 05:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.26%2026-10-25 23:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.23%2026-10-25 17:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.48%2026-10-25 11:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.38%2026-10-25 05:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 94.69%2026-10-24 23:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 93.14%2026-10-24 17:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.95%2026-10-24 11:57 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://rush33ld.com/
