iGaming Network
← NetEnt
Blood Suckers

NetEnt

Blood Suckers

Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96

Current source RTP

Good89.13%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · NetEnt

How we’d play this

What we’d actually do here

89.13% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Short blocks beat endless grinding.

  1. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  2. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
  3. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  4. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  5. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.

Skip this

  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
  • Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

89.13% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Each row is a sync snapshot — not your personal spin log.

Lowest

87.93%

Average

88.98%

Highest

90.29%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 89.15%2026-10-27 03:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 90.29%2026-10-26 21:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.18%2026-10-26 15:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.93%2026-10-26 09:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.43%2026-10-26 03:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.93%2026-10-25 21:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.72%2026-10-25 15:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.97%2026-10-25 09:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.35%2026-10-25 03:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.17%2026-10-24 21:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.21%2026-10-24 15:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.42%2026-10-24 09:28 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ez96ld.com/