iGaming Network
← NetEnt
Blood Suckers

NetEnt

Blood Suckers

Display brand: JOM99 · Data source: JOM99

Current source RTP

Low62.71%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · NetEnt

How we’d play this

Only if you’re okay walking away fast

At 62.71% you’re in the thinner band. If you play, keep stakes small and leave early.

Quick tip: One short visit beats a long chase.

  1. Ignore tips that say Low is “about to explode.”
  2. Smallest comfortable stake. Ten to twenty minutes, max.
  3. Don’t make Low a nightly habit.
  4. Walking away early beats another “one more try.”
  5. Write your stop numbers before the first spin.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat a dry spell as proof a hit is next.
  • Don’t re-deposit just to dig out of a Low hole.

Anyone selling “Low pasti cair” is inventing certainty.

In plain words

62.71% — Low (under 70%). Tougher band. Keep expectations small.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

61.57%

Average

62.69%

Highest

63.86%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 63.09%2026-10-27 04:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.57%2026-10-26 22:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.50%2026-10-26 16:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.30%2026-10-26 10:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.29%2026-10-26 04:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.71%2026-10-25 22:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.86%2026-10-25 16:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.56%2026-10-25 10:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 63.61%2026-10-25 04:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 61.96%2026-10-24 22:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.39%2026-10-24 16:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 62.49%2026-10-24 10:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://jom99ld.com/