iGaming Network
← NetEnt
Blood Suckers

NetEnt

Blood Suckers

Display brand: ONG66 · Data source: ONG66

Current source RTP

Good94.39%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · NetEnt

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

94.39% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
  2. Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
  3. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
  4. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  5. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.

Skip this

  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.
  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

94.39% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

93.54%

Average

94.67%

Highest

95.54%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 93.54%2026-10-27 04:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.55%2026-10-26 22:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.74%2026-10-26 16:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.71%2026-10-26 10:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.38%2026-10-26 04:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.79%2026-10-25 22:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.75%2026-10-25 16:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.79%2026-10-25 10:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.89%2026-10-25 04:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.33%2026-10-24 22:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.03%2026-10-24 16:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 95.54%2026-10-24 10:51 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ong66ld.com/