

NetEnt
Blood Suckers
Display brand: SA969 · Data source: SA969
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · NetEnt
How we’d play this
Good band — keep it simple
88.23% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
- If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
- Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
Skip this
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
88.23% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
87.52%
Average
88.40%
Highest
89.33%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 88.89%2026-10-27 04:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.31%2026-10-26 22:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.25%2026-10-26 16:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.15%2026-10-26 10:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.93%2026-10-26 04:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.33%2026-10-25 22:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.53%2026-10-25 16:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.52%2026-10-25 10:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.65%2026-10-25 04:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.27%2026-10-24 22:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.01%2026-10-24 16:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 88.93%2026-10-24 10:48 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://sa969ld.com/
