iGaming Network
← NetEnt
Blood Suckers

NetEnt

Blood Suckers

Display brand: SA969 · Data source: SA969

Current source RTP

Good88.23%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · NetEnt

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

88.23% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  2. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  3. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
  4. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  5. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.

Skip this

  • Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

88.23% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

87.52%

Average

88.40%

Highest

89.33%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 88.89%2026-10-27 04:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.31%2026-10-26 22:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.25%2026-10-26 16:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.15%2026-10-26 10:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.93%2026-10-26 04:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.33%2026-10-25 22:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.53%2026-10-25 16:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.52%2026-10-25 10:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.65%2026-10-25 04:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.27%2026-10-24 22:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.01%2026-10-24 16:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.93%2026-10-24 10:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://sa969ld.com/