

NetEnt
Blood Suckers
Display brand: VS96 · Data source: VS96
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · NetEnt
How we’d play this
If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)
86.34% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
- If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
- Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
- Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
- Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
Skip this
- Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
86.34% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
85.27%
Average
86.38%
Highest
87.22%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 87.09%2026-10-27 04:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.31%2026-10-26 22:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.41%2026-10-26 16:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.76%2026-10-26 10:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.92%2026-10-26 04:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.00%2026-10-25 22:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 85.94%2026-10-25 16:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 85.64%2026-10-25 10:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 85.27%2026-10-25 04:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.76%2026-10-24 22:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.22%2026-10-24 16:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.18%2026-10-24 10:46 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://vs96ld.com/
