

NetEnt
Butterfly Staxx
Display brand: AC69 · Data source: AC69
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · NetEnt
How we’d play this
If you’re playing this one (Good RTP)
91.10% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Win a bit, leave a bit. Don’t get greedy mid-session.
- Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
- Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
- Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
Skip this
- Don’t raise after two quiet spins.
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
91.10% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.
Lowest
89.91%
Average
91.04%
Highest
92.30%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 90.64%2026-10-27 05:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.15%2026-10-26 23:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.23%2026-10-26 17:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.52%2026-10-26 11:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.91%2026-10-26 05:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.05%2026-10-25 23:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 92.30%2026-10-25 17:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.98%2026-10-25 11:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.20%2026-10-25 05:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.52%2026-10-24 23:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.91%2026-10-24 17:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.04%2026-10-24 11:59 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://ac69ld.com/
