iGaming Network
← NetEnt
Disco Danny

NetEnt

Disco Danny

Display brand: EZ96 · Data source: EZ96

Current source RTP

Good86.10%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · NetEnt

How we’d play this

Before you mash spin on a Good title

86.10% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.

  1. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  2. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  3. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  4. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  5. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.

Skip this

  • Don’t play longer to “make the Good RTP work.”
  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

86.10% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

85.00%

Average

86.36%

Highest

87.27%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 86.96%2026-10-27 06:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.67%2026-10-27 00:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.24%2026-10-26 18:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.25%2026-10-26 12:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.15%2026-10-26 06:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.36%2026-10-26 00:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.27%2026-10-25 18:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.14%2026-10-25 12:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.16%2026-10-25 06:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 85.00%2026-10-25 00:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.13%2026-10-24 18:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.00%2026-10-24 12:09 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://ez96ld.com/