iGaming Network
← NoLimit City
Crazy Ex-Girlfriend

NoLimit City

Crazy Ex-Girlfriend

Display brand: ZAS36 · Data source: ZAS36

Current source RTP

Good88.44%

Last observed 2026-10-27 04:49 UTC

Share this RTP page · NoLimit City

How we’d play this

Good band — keep it simple

88.44% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Same stake. Clear exits. Timer on.

  1. Feeling rushed, angry, or clicking too fast? Close it for fifteen minutes. Seriously.
  2. When you hit your win stop, leave. “One more round” is how good sessions die.
  3. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  4. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  5. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.

Skip this

  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

88.44% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

87.52%

Average

88.59%

Highest

89.58%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 88.09%2026-10-27 04:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.84%2026-10-26 22:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.22%2026-10-26 16:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.66%2026-10-26 10:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.29%2026-10-26 04:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.71%2026-10-25 22:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.58%2026-10-25 16:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.52%2026-10-25 10:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.79%2026-10-25 04:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.23%2026-10-24 22:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.27%2026-10-24 16:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.94%2026-10-24 10:49 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://zas36ld.com/