iGaming Network
← NoLimit City
Dead Canary

NoLimit City

Dead Canary

Display brand: ZAS36 · Data source: ZAS36

Current source RTP

Good93.12%

Last observed 2026-10-27 04:48 UTC

Share this RTP page · NoLimit City

How we’d play this

A calmer way to sit with Good RTP

93.12% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: If you’re tilting, you’re done for now.

  1. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.
  2. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  3. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  4. If friends send “hot hour” screenshots, smile and ignore them.
  5. Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.

Skip this

  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.
  • Don’t raise after two quiet spins.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

93.12% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

Tiny changes on the chart don’t mean the reels “owe” you a hit.

Lowest

92.01%

Average

92.87%

Highest

94.16%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 92.50%2026-10-27 04:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.16%2026-10-26 22:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.11%2026-10-26 16:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.44%2026-10-26 10:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.01%2026-10-26 04:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.14%2026-10-25 22:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 93.18%2026-10-25 16:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.28%2026-10-25 10:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.03%2026-10-25 04:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 94.02%2026-10-24 22:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.31%2026-10-24 16:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 92.29%2026-10-24 10:48 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://zas36ld.com/