

PG Soft
Candy Bonanza
Display brand: RM68 · Data source: RM68
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · PG Soft
How we’d play this
Before you mash spin on a Good title
90.40% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: Good looks nicer — your limits still run the show.
- Had a nice hit? Mentally bank some of it. Don’t immediately try to double the table.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
- Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
Skip this
- Don’t go all-in just because the badge is green.
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
90.40% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
89.21%
Average
90.67%
Highest
91.58%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 91.48%2026-10-27 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.47%2026-10-26 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.30%2026-10-26 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.33%2026-10-26 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.21%2026-10-26 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.50%2026-10-25 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.47%2026-10-25 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.14%2026-10-25 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.96%2026-10-25 04:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 90.76%2026-10-24 22:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 91.58%2026-10-24 16:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 89.89%2026-10-24 10:38 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://rm68ld.com/
