iGaming Network
← PG Soft
Buffalo Win

PG Soft

Buffalo Win

Display brand: PP96 · Data source: PP96

Current source RTP

Good88.13%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · PG Soft

How we’d play this

What we’d actually do here

88.13% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: Short blocks beat endless grinding.

  1. Stay on this game for the session. Hopping every few spins usually means you’re chasing.
  2. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  3. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  4. Keep bill money and play money separate. If you’re mixing them, stop.
  5. If you top up, don’t use that as an excuse to suddenly bet bigger.

Skip this

  • Don’t stack five Good games in a panic night.
  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

88.13% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

86.94%

Average

88.08%

Highest

89.23%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 87.58%2026-10-27 04:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.89%2026-10-26 22:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.06%2026-10-26 16:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.16%2026-10-26 10:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.79%2026-10-26 04:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.95%2026-10-25 22:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.23%2026-10-25 16:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 89.11%2026-10-25 10:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.63%2026-10-25 04:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.35%2026-10-24 22:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.94%2026-10-24 16:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 88.23%2026-10-24 10:38 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://pp96ld.com/