iGaming Network
← PG Soft
Cocktail Nights

PG Soft

Cocktail Nights

Display brand: SK69 · Data source: SK69

Current source RTP

Good87.16%

Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC

Share this RTP page · PG Soft

How we’d play this

A calmer way to sit with Good RTP

87.16% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”

Quick tip: If you’re tilting, you’re done for now.

  1. Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
  2. Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
  3. Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
  4. Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
  5. Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.

Skip this

  • Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
  • Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.

Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.

In plain words

87.16% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.

We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.

There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.

The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.

Lowest

86.24%

Average

87.32%

Highest

87.98%

RTP observation history

12 records

Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).

  • 87.83%2026-10-27 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.01%2026-10-26 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.55%2026-10-26 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.60%2026-10-26 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.68%2026-10-26 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.98%2026-10-25 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.87%2026-10-25 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.43%2026-10-25 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.88%2026-10-25 05:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 86.24%2026-10-24 23:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.02%2026-10-24 17:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

  • 87.78%2026-10-24 11:53 UTC

    iGaming Network · not verified

Network analysis

Insufficient data

There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.

iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.

Source: https://sk69ld.com/