

PG Soft
Cocktail Nights
Display brand: SK69 · Data source: SK69
Current source RTP
Last observed 2026-10-25 08:00 UTC
Share this RTP page · PG Soft
How we’d play this
A calmer way to sit with Good RTP
87.16% sits in Good. Think of it as “this title looks healthier in the catalog,” not “time to go hard.”
Quick tip: If you’re tilting, you’re done for now.
- Give yourself a time box (say 20–40 minutes). When the timer ends, stand up.
- Pick one stake size and stick with it for a while. Don’t keep bumping it because you “feel” something.
- Good RTP is a reason to pick the game — not a reason to ignore your limits.
- Decide your walk-away number before you start — both for winning a bit and for losing enough.
- Write the start amount somewhere. End amount too. You’ll thank yourself later.
Skip this
- Don’t treat Good as “it’s due.”
- Don’t skip your loss stop after a near miss.
Anyone selling a “guaranteed pola” is selling you a story.
In plain words
87.16% — Good range (85–97%). Looks healthier in the catalog. Still not a promise for the next spin.
We haven’t verified volatility from the source — so we won’t invent a label.
There’s no spin pattern we can promise you. Slots use RNG. The number you see is a band, not a win calendar.
The history below is just how the displayed band moved over syncs. Little wiggles aren’t a signal for your next spin.
Lowest
86.24%
Average
87.32%
Highest
87.98%
RTP observation history
12 records
Each row = a sync from the source (not your personal spin results).
- 87.83%2026-10-27 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.01%2026-10-26 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.55%2026-10-26 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.60%2026-10-26 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.68%2026-10-26 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.98%2026-10-25 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.87%2026-10-25 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.43%2026-10-25 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.88%2026-10-25 05:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 86.24%2026-10-24 23:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.02%2026-10-24 17:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
- 87.78%2026-10-24 11:53 UTC
iGaming Network · not verified
Network analysis
Insufficient data
There’s an RTP number, but we can’t honestly label volatility Low/Average/High without evidence — so we leave it as insufficient data.
iGaming Network: displayed RTP sits randomly in the 85–97 / 70–85 / under-70 bands. It doesn’t predict what happens next.
Source: https://sk69ld.com/
